TINJAUAN HUKUM KEWENANGAN JAKSA DALAM PEMERIKSAAN TAMBAHAN MENURUT ASAS DOMINUS LITIS BERDASARKAN KUHAP

Abstract

As a product of the law touted as the great work of the nation

Indonesia, KUHAP introduces a functional differentiation framework, where

The investigation is entirely handed over to the police, while the prosecutor's office

serves only as a public prosecutor and the conduct of the management of judges.

In kuhap itself adheres to the principle of functional differentiation, will

It raises a question as to what is the position of Dominus litis in the KUHAP

when combined with the integrared criminal justice system in it

it contains the principle of functional differentiation. It means when we leave.

From the understanding that Dominus litis is the controller of the case, then the extent to which

stages of the examination process that can be viewed as dominis litis Jaksaan

1. This question is a consequence, when the relationship between

police with the prosecutor at the investigation stage is only limited to coordination

Functional. KUHAP which adheres to the principles of specialization, differentiation and

complement, not only distinguishing and dividing tasks and authorities,

but also provides a barrier to accountability for the scope of the investigation's duties,

investigation, prosecution and examination at an in-ordered court hearing.

The consequences that arise from the principle of functional differentiation, illustrated from several

the case that led to a free verdict from the Panel of Judges, due to witnesses /

The defendant revoked BAP a quo. Revocation of bap witness/defendant,

due to pressure or engineering of the case at the stage of investigation conducted

by the police as an investigator. The above incident clearly harms the prosecution.

general and the accused himself.