ANALISIS PENERAPAN PRINSIP PREJUDICIEL GESCHILL DALAM PUTUSAN SELA PENGADILAN NEGERI BEKASI NOMOR: 1242/Pid.B/2018/PN.Bks Tanggal 19 November 2018
Abstract
The judge as the part that decides on the case plays a very important role in determining the
future of the law, because each judge's decision will become the center of public attention. The
judge does not only act as a mouthpiece of the law, but the judge also acts as the inventor of the
law (recht vinding). The exercise of the authority of judges in criminal proceedings in law
enforcement should uphold the principles that apply in the Criminal Procedure Code in court
and benefit justice seekers. in the development of criminal procedure law in Indonesia,
specifically regulating the postponement of criminal proceedings related to civil cases or socalled prejudiciel geschil in Indonesia, is regulated in Article 81 of the Criminal Code which
stipulates that "Postponement of criminal prosecution develops with judicial disputes, delays
expired ". However, if examined closely, it seems that the provisions of Article 81 of the
Criminal Code only link prayer disputes with expiration, but not explicitly which will take
precedence when civil and criminal cases are brought to court at the same time. The
unregulated court dispute has clearly made the legal vacuum (rechtsvacuum) related to
prejudicieel geschil, as well as lead to dualism in judicial practices in Indonesia.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License .
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).